There is a vitally important shift underway in how we think about progress. Growing numbers of economists, political leaders and expert commentators are calling for better measures of how well society is doing; measures that track not just our economic standard of living, but our overall quality of life. This shift also mirrors the way many of us are feeling too: that the modern consumer economy has failed to deliver fair outcomes and fulfilling lives.
In recent decades our lives have become increasingly orientated in the service of the economy, rather than the other way around. Yet economic growth is really just a means to an end; it only matters if it contributes to social progress and human wellbeing. And the tragedy is that decades of growth and material progress have failed to deliver a measurable increase in life satisfaction.
When prime minister David Cameron announced that he was asking the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to start measuring the UK’s national wellbeing, this was greeted with derision and eye-rolling in the media. Critics suggested that it was a cynical attempt to distract us from our economic woes, or simply a waste of money at a time when there are more important things to worry about.
These concerns are understandable, but misplaced. It is of course difficult to trust a government that claims a commitment to wellbeing while simultaneously slashing funding for public services that contribute to it. But to see this only through a political lens would be to miss the point. Focusing on wellbeing isn’t a distraction, it’s about finding out what will really improve people’s lives and then acting on it, which is surely what good government should be all about?
For the very first time the UK is now officially measuring and valuing people’s subjective feelings about their lives. This isn’t some Orwellian nightmare where we’re forced to be happy with our lot; in fact it’s quite the opposite. It is an opportunity for government to listen to how we’re feeling and learn what we value most. Over time it could lead to a greater focus on initiatives that are good for people’s wellbeing, and recognition that these aren’t always the same as what’s good for growing the economy.
So what did we learn from the initial publication of ONS wellbeing data in December 2011? Despite all the economic doom and gloom, it seems that more than three quarters of people rated their overall life satisfaction as seven or more out of ten.
Countries like Denmark and Canada however, consistently score above eight out of ten for average life satisfaction, so we could be doing better. More worryingly, 8% of people rated their life satisfaction as less than 5 out of 10. This is a very low life satisfaction score, similar to average scores in countries like Bangladesh and Cambodia.
Most worryingly of all, 27% of the population recorded high levels of anxiety. Some of this may relate to the economic climate, but much of it undoubtedly reflects the enormous pressure that people are under in our increasingly competitive society. Many who appear successful in outward, material terms are actually suffering serious emotional and psychological trauma.
Understanding these findings and what drives them should be a top priority for policy makers. Evidence suggests that a focus on wellbeing might lead to a greater emphasis on promoting good mental health; putting economic stability before economic growth; teaching life skills in schools; and supporting families in need – particularly young children in their formative years. For example, at a local level, a council considering the closure of a library or play area to make way for a new commercial development might act differently.
But perhaps most importantly, rethinking what we prioritise also has implications for each of us as individuals. The self-centred values that have accompanied our quest for economic growth have encouraged too many of us to put our financial success ahead of concerns for the wellbeing of our families, our communities and even ourselves.
We too can benefit from a shift in priorities and a recognition that real happiness is less about what we earn or own and more about our relationships and state of mind; it’s as much about what we can contribute as what we can get for ourselves. A happier society starts with each of us.
Getting to a society where as many people as possible are flourishing and as few people as possible are unhappy, requires both policy and social change. If politicians are to be criticised, it should be for failing to improve people’s wellbeing not for wanting to measure it. But let’s also recognise that we can all play our part in helping create a happier society.
This article is reprinted with permission. Dr Mark Williamson is director of Action for Happiness, which launched in 2011 and has members from over 100 countries who are taking action in their everyday lives to help build happier communities, families, schools and workplaces.
From the article: "Many who appear successful in outward, material terms are actually suffering serious emotional and psychological trauma."
Current measures focus on material wealth(or the lack of it) and consequently, the long term costs to the individual and society are being ignored. I shared my views on this subject in my post "Evolving Measures" at http://xynobooks.com/2012/0...
On Jul 29, 2012 Chris Sulentic wrote:
This article opens up a topic that has value at many levels. The concept of measuring "progress" seems to have the potential to be quite inexpensive while simultaneously being immensely relevant to our lives. Yet it also depends how this measuring process is framed, so perhaps the simplicity is a chimera that will be yet another battleground between competing political philosophies and hence worthless except as another way to separate us and cause endless fighting, suffering and misery. At a personal level, the concept of progress exists in our minds as a conceptual shield that we unconsciously adhere to in order to protect our individual selves from the fear of change. I think it's obvious that change is not always good and I (rightly, I think) fear that change is often not good at all; hence justifying our instinctual fear. In a very real sense it comes down to dealing with loss, or potential loss, while simultaneously trusting that those who promote the changes in our world have sufficient wherewithal to deserve to hold the power that moves us. The old must be destroyed in order for the new to arise. It’s much like watching a newborn baby move through a series of developmental stages in his or her infancy, and then later through childhood. It can be heartbreaking to see a joyful stage pass, yet another always seems to unfold to take its place, and it too is fulfilling like a kaleidoscope of permutations that continually evoke joy. A more abstract sense of this is represented in an age-old concept that is perhaps best represented in the popular image of the dancing Shiva... In one hand, Shiva holds fire which is symbolic in its destruction of the old. Another one of Shiva’s hands symbolically creates the new (progress) through the castanets. All of these processes are rendered simultaneously while Shiva effortlessly dances on the dwarf of ignorance. And here is where the danger lies... in our own institutionalized ignorance. Are we unwittingly the dwarves who are initiating the changes that we call progress or are we fortunate enough to replicate the Shiva consciousness? Are we capable of telling the difference and have we examined our unconscious assumptions? No – no of course not. Perhaps we imagine ourselves to be the protagonists when we are not. Are we that evolved as a society? If you are familiar with Maslow's hierarchy of needs it's painfully obvious that we are stuck at Stage 1 (safety needs). So if we look in the mirror, how evolved are we really? Really? So we speak of progress but by whose measure? In America we have basically three views, that of Republicans, Democrats and if we are open minded enough, Libertarians. So maybe we should consciously forget about measuring progress by some biased standard and instead simply focus on measuring our collective sense of well-being. Well being is just that - a misery index framed in positive words. We are compelled to frame this idea in the positive. In fact it’s critically important that we do - because in order to grow and evolve, we have to fight negativity at every level. It has to be an imperative on our behalf to embrace the positive, for that is our only hope to somehow find a higher level of consciousness; call it God if you will. Either way we have performed a spiritual alchemy on all of the potential red herrings due to a particular stripe of political polarization and created something positive, hopeful, and ultimately fulfilling.
[Hide Full Comment]Post Your Reply